10 November 2006

veteran's day eve

on veteran's day, every year, there is much lip-service given to the sacrifices that veterans have made for us. i propose that this sacrifce has more of an effect on those in power than the rest of us masses, but i could be wrong. just a few minutes ago, i read a comment on another blog about how we should all be thankful to sleep in peace at night, due to these sacrifices. i couldn't help but think, i'm not sleeping well, and haven't for some time. i won't be surprised if another horrible attack happens in this country - current policies are making us all less safe. in fact, i don't feel any safer now than i did watching planes hit buildings on september 11th. the warriors historically tend to create more wars - no matter where they come from. i'am not comforted. it also pains me greatly to know that these sacrifices being made are for... tell me again, for what, exactly?

in the same breath, i wouldn't wish on anyone to be a veteran. it means that they will have seen things that are the stuff of nightmares. i can't begin to even imagine what they go through on a day-to-day, what it feels like to be so far away from home, family, friends and constantly in fear for my life. i would not a good soldier make. and i'm incredibly torn. it is difficult for me to support anything that has to do with warring, yet, deep down, i know that each and everyone that has volunteered to join the armed forces is still a person, a somebodies somebody. as hubby reminds me, "war stands to turn regular, everyday people into animals. that is what war does."

and now, veterans are returning home to enjoy the same luxaries that their fore bearers have. horrible health care, disgraceful mental health support, benefits that have been axed by bush, families having had been torn apart and struggling to get by, and the very real possibility that they will be called up to go serve again. you know it's bad when there are ads on television asking for donations to help the families of the soldiers. if anything, they and their families should be taken care of, by those who shoo them off to do their bidding. yet, i have been accused on more than one occasion of not "supporting the troops." go figure.

check out the divine ms. liberty's post for some more troop support ideas.


what follows is an older piece by howard zinn, but i think that the ultimate message is still very relevant today - if not more now than when it was written.

November 13, 2002

Veterans Day

By Howard Zinn


Veterans Day used to be called Armistice Day, because it was November 11, 1918, at 11 AM - the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month, that the first World War came to an end.

It would be good to remember a few things about that war as this country is about to embark on still another war. First, that you don’t "win" wars. We "won" World War I, but sowed the seeds of another world war. War is a quick fix, like crack. An exultant high - we won! - and soon you’re down again, and you need another fix, another war.

In World War I. the German Kaiser was presented as the epitome of evil - a threat to the world,, who must be eliminated for our safety. In truth, he was bad, but his danger to us was enormously exaggerated, as with Saddam Hussein. So the Allies defeated Germany, got rid of the Kaiser, and ten million men died on the battlefields.

We can get rid of Saddam Hussein. Iraq is a fifth-rate military power, with no Air Force to speak of, its army a remnant of what it was ten years ago, the country still in ruins, its infrastructure devastated by two wars, its people weakened by ten years of sanctions depriving people of food and hospitals of medicine, and causing hundreds of thousands of deaths. And the U.S. with its invincible Air Force, will win.

In the course of that, tens of thousands of Iraqis will die, , many of them innocent civilians, others poor, miserable conscripts in the Iraqi army. We will be killing the victims of Saddam Hussein. . Because of its high tech weaponry and overwhelming military superiority, America will lose few soldiers. But it will lose its soul.

World War I, presented to the public as a war for democracy, for freedom, was in fact a war fought by imperial powers (France, England, Russia) against an imperial rival, Germany. It led, not to the freedom of colonial peoples, but to a change in who dominated the Middle East, Africa, Eastern Europe.

Now, the war in Iraq is presented as a moral crusade to end the menace of "weapons of mass destruction", the evidence for which is far from clear. The assumption that Saddam would use them and invite annihilation (since most weapons of mass destruction in the world are held by the United States) makes no sense.

As in the first World War, there are imperial motives at work, and the defeat of Saddam will lead to a change in who controls the precious oil reserves of Iraq. Deals will be cut with Russia, France and England to divide the booty. The talks are going on right now.

The first World war was sold to the American public as "the war to end all wars". But twenty-one years later came World War II, in which fifty million people were killed. The United Nations was formed, as its Charter says, "to end the scourge of war which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind".

But no, it’s been war after war for the United States: Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Yugoslavia. All accompanied by claims that we were at war for some good cause, all resulting in the loss of human life, all demanding acceptance of the government’s reasons for war, most of which turned out to be lies. We should have learned from Vietnam that true patriotism does not mean marching off to war just because the government tells you to. Those 58,000 names on the Washington memorial should make that clear.

As a veteran of World War II, as a student of the history of our wars, and contemplating still another war, I suggest we keep certain things in mind. First, that we must be extremely skeptical of whatever government officials tell us about the reasons for going to war. Second, that what is certain about war is that large numbers of innocent people will die, including many children, and what is uncertain about war is that any good will come of it.

Finally, that when you go to war, you assume that the lives of people in another country are not as valuable as the lives of your own countrymen. If we really believe, as our most fundamental moral principles demand we believe, that the children in other countries have as much right to live as our children, then we must refuse the call to war. It is time, by public demand, by general outcry, to end "the scourge of war" .

The best thing we can do for Veterans Day is to pledge: "No more war veterans".

Labels:

|




FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We have posted it here in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social justice and other issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The material in this site is provided for educational and informational purposes only.